Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,970,682 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.259% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 259.2 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,387, a difference of 14.8%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $75,420, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,265, a difference of 0.88%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,049, a difference of 0.93%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,823, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), poverty (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.42, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 94.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.9%).