Chickasaw vs Haitian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,827,170 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Haitians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Haitians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Haitians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 37.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,231, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $36,374, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,218, a difference of 0.16%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,918, a difference of 0.60%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,289, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.6%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 35.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 89.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 68.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 70.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).