Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Albania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Albania

Fair
Average
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,838
SOCIAL INDEX
55.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
167th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Albania Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,249,007 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Immigrants from Albania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 36.6 Immigrants from Albania.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Albania Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,387, a difference of 27.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,929, a difference of 25.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,957, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,828, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $57,179, a difference of 19.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$46,387
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Good
$105,285
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Good
$86,534
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$49,377
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$57,179
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$42,388
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,597
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Excellent
$97,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Good
$101,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$57,828
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
24.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Average
9.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
15.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
74.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.74%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
62.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 80.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 59.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
87.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
46.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
14.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 47.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Good
86.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Fair
64.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
40.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.0%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Albania Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Albania
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%