Chickasaw vs Slovene Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slovene
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Slovenes

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,224
SOCIAL INDEX
79.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
81st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slovene Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,291,118 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Slovenes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 113.4 Slovenes.
Chickasaw Integration in Slovene Communities

Chickasaw vs Slovene Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,885, a difference of 25.2%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,581, a difference of 25.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,020, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,241, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,886, a difference of 13.7%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Income
Income MetricChickasawSlovene
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Excellent
$45,581
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Excellent
$106,020
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Average
$85,562
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Excellent
$47,995
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$57,145
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Average
$39,817
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$50,886
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Good
$96,439
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Good
$102,885
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Fair
$60,241
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.3%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 50.4%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 43.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSlovene
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
3.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.8%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSlovene
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSlovene
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Poor
64.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
43.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSlovene
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
62.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
25.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.07
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Good
31.2%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSlovene
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.3%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSlovene
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
67.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
47.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chickasaw vs Slovene Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 12.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.8%).
Chickasaw vs Slovene Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSlovene
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%