Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,852,338 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 28.1 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.8%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,848, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $36,017, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $78,045, a difference of 0.15%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,512, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,325, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 14.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.89%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%).