Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Western Europe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Western Europe

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,245
SOCIAL INDEX
69.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
127th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Western Europe Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,623,113 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 26.8 Immigrants from Western Europe.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Western Europe Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,065, a difference of 37.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,824, a difference of 32.4%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $112,688, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,957, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,933, a difference of 20.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$50,065
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$112,688
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$91,936
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$50,549
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$60,334
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$41,990
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Excellent
$52,957
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$102,654
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$108,824
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$64,933
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.1%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Poor
82.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Good
31.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Average
55.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 70.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
62.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Western Europe
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%