Chickasaw vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,533,075 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $41,314, a difference of 15.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $32,012, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,018, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,930, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $32,564, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 92.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 60.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 8.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 47.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), family households (64.4% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%).