Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,346,334 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,141, a difference of 21.8%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,054, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $92,876, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,237, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,848, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 31.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.2%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%).