Chickasaw vs Okinawan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,441,919 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 26.8 Okinawans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $119,349, a difference of 53.1%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $55,817, a difference of 53.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $106,624, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,701, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $70,846, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 78.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 117.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 117.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 98.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 79.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.1%).