Chickasaw vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,958,284 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,566, a difference of 27.2%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,398, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,952, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,219, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,266, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.90%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.54%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arab communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.5%).