Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,118,859 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 17.2 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,046, a difference of 24.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,190, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $104,966, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,843, a difference of 15.1%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,615, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.3%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 66.6%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.2%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.0%).