Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,274,827 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $107,650, a difference of 38.1%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $96,292, a difference of 37.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,796, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,179, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,497, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 72.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 69.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.7%).