Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,566,967 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,394, a difference of 29.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,496, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,992, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,914, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,643, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%).