Chickasaw vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,770,161 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 16.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $71,021, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,919, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,149, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,306, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,027, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.2%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).