Chickasaw vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,573,024 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 45.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $42,550, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $70,423, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $31,560, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $39,726, a difference of 12.7%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $35,560, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 118.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 100.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 99.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 67.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 67.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 25.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.39%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 97.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 57.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.6%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 3.3%).