Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from China
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Subsaharan African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,196,584 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.597. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 29.3 Immigrants from China.
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $119,756, a difference of 42.2%), median household income ($77,631 compared to $105,335, a difference of 35.7%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $54,264, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.9%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $57,931, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $69,174, a difference of 22.2%).
Income Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,152 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,748 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,631 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,118 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,408 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,391 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,691 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,235 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,691 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,615 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Poor 26.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 52.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.1%).
Poverty Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Unemployment Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.77%).
Labor Participation Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.7% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 54.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.68%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.79%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 64.2%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%).
Disability Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |