Luxembourger vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,679,361 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.2%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $105,335, a difference of 21.9%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $67,353, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $69,174, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 45.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 182.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%).