Chickasaw vs Senegalese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Senegalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Senegalese

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,684
SOCIAL INDEX
14.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
292nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Senegalese Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,633,417 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Senegalese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Senegalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 9.6 Senegalese.
Chickasaw Integration in Senegalese Communities

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 31.5%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,384, a difference of 14.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $41,000, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,591, a difference of 0.26%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,774, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $86,897, a difference of 5.7%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Income
Income MetricChickasawSenegalese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$41,000
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$91,475
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$74,999
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$44,373
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$49,774
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Fair
$39,384
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$48,953
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$82,852
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$86,897
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$53,591
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
20.7%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSenegalese
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
23.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
20.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.4%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSenegalese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
21.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSenegalese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Fair
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.4%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.84%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSenegalese
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
59.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
40.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
36.8%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 151.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 72.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.0%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSenegalese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
19.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
80.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
44.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.3%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.26%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSenegalese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
63.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Poor
58.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Chickasaw vs Senegalese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.0%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%).
Chickasaw vs Senegalese Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSenegalese
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%