Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,372,720 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,302, a difference of 35.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $109,198, a difference of 32.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $102,407, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,307, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,319, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 37.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.1%).