Chickasaw vs Fijian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Fijian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Fijians

Fair
Fair
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Fijian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,769,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Fijians.
Chickasaw Integration in Fijian Communities

Chickasaw vs Fijian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,132, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,205, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,690, a difference of 0.59%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,193, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,114, a difference of 2.0%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Income
Income MetricChickasawFijian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$36,690
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$87,387
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$74,205
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$40,193
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$45,607
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$35,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$50,132
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$79,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$85,187
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$56,768
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
22.9%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.24%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawFijian
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.0%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawFijian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawFijian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
80.2%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.32%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawFijian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Fair
46.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Fair
32.3%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawFijian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.8%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.8%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawFijian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
86.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
51.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
37.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
28.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.1%

Chickasaw vs Fijian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%).
Chickasaw vs Fijian Disability
Disability MetricChickasawFijian
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%