Chickasaw vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,312,037 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 61.0 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.7%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $33,921, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $45,566, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $81,750, a difference of 0.54%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $77,089, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,063, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 50.2%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 12.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 73.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%).