Chickasaw vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,052,799 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 26.8 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $40,266, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $93,858, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,673, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,356, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,924, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.0%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.3%).