Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,800,772 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 133.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,691, a difference of 13.2%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,133, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,177, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,464, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.32%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.73%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.26%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 73.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.1%).