Chickasaw vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,410,905 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 56.2 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $110,648, a difference of 58.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $129,560, a difference of 57.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $121,778, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $59,187, a difference of 32.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $72,099, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 77.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 51.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 83.2%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 87.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 82.6%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 12.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.4%).