Chickasaw vs Moroccan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Moroccans

Fair
Fair
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Moroccan Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,209,086 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 128.9 Moroccans.
Chickasaw Integration in Moroccan Communities

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,854, a difference of 25.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,468, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,117, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,683, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,499, a difference of 18.1%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Income
Income MetricChickasawMoroccan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$45,854
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Good
$104,488
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Good
$86,468
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$48,838
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Excellent
$56,499
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$41,872
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,256
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Good
$96,117
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Average
$100,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Fair
$59,683
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
24.0%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawMoroccan
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.8%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawMoroccan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawMoroccan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Poor
82.5%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawMoroccan
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Average
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Average
31.8%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 86.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 51.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.8%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawMoroccan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
14.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
48.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
15.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.9%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 47.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawMoroccan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
40.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Chickasaw vs Moroccan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Disability
Disability MetricChickasawMoroccan
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.5%