Chickasaw vs Moroccan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Moroccan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Moroccans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Moroccan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,209,086 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 128.9 Moroccans.
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,854, a difference of 25.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,468, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,117, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,683, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,499, a difference of 18.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $45,854 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $104,488 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,468 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,838 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,499 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,872 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,256 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,117 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $100,138 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Fair $59,683 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Poor 35.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Poor 82.5% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.8% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 86.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 51.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 48.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 47.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 48.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Moroccan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Moroccan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |