Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,236,258 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 40.1 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $99,933, a difference of 42.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $110,787, a difference of 42.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $116,566, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $67,594, a difference of 25.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $56,379, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.95%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 35.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 69.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%).