Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,888,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 34.2 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,164, a difference of 32.1%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $90,907, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,470, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.59%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,364, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,273, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.39%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.2%).