Chickasaw vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,674,740 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.652% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 652.5 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,472, a difference of 21.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,410, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,458, a difference of 3.4%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,442, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,860, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.7%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 124.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.1%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 78.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.6%).