Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from India
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from India

Fair
Exceptional
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,255
SOCIAL INDEX
100/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
1st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from India Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,352,881 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 30.0 Immigrants from India.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from India Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $113,009, a difference of 61.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $132,488, a difference of 61.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $124,238, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 16.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $59,914, a difference of 33.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $72,804, a difference of 35.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$55,268
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$134,028
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$113,009
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$60,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$74,207
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$48,292
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$59,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$124,238
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$132,488
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$72,804
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
31.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 89.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 82.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
23.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 58.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.58%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 10.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
31.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
52.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
51.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 95.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
89.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
74.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
69.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
58.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 94.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 13.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from India Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from India
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
19.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%