Chickasaw vs Basque Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Basque
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Basques
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,979
SOCIAL INDEX
67.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
133rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Basque Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,708,285 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Basques within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Basques. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 23.8 Basques.
Chickasaw vs Basque Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,387, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,001, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,709, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,352, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,399, a difference of 14.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,086 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $104,760 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $87,001 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,370 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,352 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,709 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,653 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.8% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Average 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.32%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.9%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 24.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Excellent 89.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 60.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 37.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Basque Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Basque communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Basque |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |