Chickasaw vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,167,377 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 103.3 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,682, a difference of 26.1%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,144, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,866, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,802, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,104, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 57.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.9%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.79%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.08, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.5%).