Chickasaw vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,274,119 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 50.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,299, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,844, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,636, a difference of 3.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $85,571, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $88,987, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 43.8%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.1%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 278.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 115.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 31.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 66.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 94.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 84.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 75.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.1%).