Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hungary Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,604,831 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Immigrants from Hungary. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 128.8 Immigrants from Hungary.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,303, a difference of 35.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $102,655, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,267, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.52%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,798, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,277, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.61%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 62.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%).