Chickasaw vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,292,902 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,309, a difference of 28.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $99,429, a difference of 27.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,976, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.73%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,440, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,177, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 37.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%).