Chickasaw vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,305,699 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 71.3 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $41,695, a difference of 14.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $93,718, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $96,783, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,982, a difference of 5.0%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,216, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,401, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.0%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.59%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.40%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.13%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.1%).