Chickasaw vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,084,732 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.709. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 136.1 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 27.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,774, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,514, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,005 compared to $70,094, a difference of 0.13%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $82,474, a difference of 0.34%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,792, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 39.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 78.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 73.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 74.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 88.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.82%), female disability (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.1%).