Chickasaw vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,456,824 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 18.7 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 48.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,210, a difference of 23.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,973, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $56,351, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,613, a difference of 5.8%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $93,373, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.61%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 48.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 39.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.40, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 272.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 113.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 66.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 93.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 95.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 71.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.2%).