Lebanese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 366,682,574 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to a decrease of 42.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,339 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($88,091 compared to $105,335, a difference of 19.6%), and per capita income ($45,840 compared to $54,264, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,287 compared to $69,174, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 75.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%).