Chickasaw vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,230,616 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 99.3 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $40,550, a difference of 32.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $34,584, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $60,305, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $32,500, a difference of 5.9%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $36,876, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $41,715, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 75.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 69.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 83.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 66.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), disability (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.4%).