Chickasaw vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,011,039 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.209% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 209.3 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,543, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,661, a difference of 20.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,011, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,934, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,704, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 36.1%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.57%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.3%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.5%).