Chickasaw vs Croatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,694,125 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Croatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,383, a difference of 31.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $102,414, a difference of 31.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,742, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,662, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,225, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.1%).