Chickasaw vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,431,761 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 70.5 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,626, a difference of 17.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $78,803, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,093, a difference of 0.55%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,280, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $56,321, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 100.5%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%).