Chickasaw vs Crow Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Crow

Fair
Fair
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Crow Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,562 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.746. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 144.9 Crow.
Chickasaw Integration in Crow Communities

Chickasaw vs Crow Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.5%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $31,729, a difference of 15.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $42,434, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,266, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,012, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $38,707, a difference of 5.1%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Income
Income MetricChickasawCrow
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$31,729
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$76,605
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$63,681
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$38,707
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$42,434
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$35,266
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$47,012
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$71,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$74,257
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$49,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.1%

Chickasaw vs Crow Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.1%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 59.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 23.4%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawCrow
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
33.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
31.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
26.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
32.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.4%

Chickasaw vs Crow Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 282.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 269.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 223.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.7%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawCrow
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
20.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
26.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%

Chickasaw vs Crow Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawCrow
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
60.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
78.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
78.3%

Chickasaw vs Crow Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.7%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.82, a difference of 20.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawCrow
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
41.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.82
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
40.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
40.4%

Chickasaw vs Crow Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawCrow
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
89.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Good
55.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.8%

Chickasaw vs Crow Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawCrow
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
99.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
99.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
99.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
99.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
99.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
99.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
27.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chickasaw vs Crow Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Chickasaw vs Crow Disability
Disability MetricChickasawCrow
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
27.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
49.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.5%