European vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,404,516 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to an increase of 22.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,310 compared to $119,756, a difference of 21.8%), median female earnings ($39,457 compared to $46,972, a difference of 19.1%), and median household income ($88,751 compared to $105,335, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,779 compared to $69,174, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $57,931, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 32.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 112.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 58.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%).