Chickasaw vs Honduran Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Honduran
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Hondurans

Fair
Tragic
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,014
SOCIAL INDEX
7.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
327th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Honduran Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,652,384 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hondurans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Hondurans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 40.0 Hondurans.
Chickasaw Integration in Honduran Communities

Chickasaw vs Honduran Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,885, a difference of 9.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,588, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,638, a difference of 0.080%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,004, a difference of 0.41%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $78,540, a difference of 0.78%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Income
Income MetricChickasawHonduran
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$37,031
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$85,004
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$72,588
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$40,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$46,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$35,013
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$48,885
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$78,540
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$84,079
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$52,634
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
23.6%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawHonduran
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
22.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
22.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
25.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
34.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.5%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawHonduran
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawHonduran
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Fair
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.4%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.9%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.060%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawHonduran
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
42.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
38.7%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 52.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawHonduran
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
12.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Poor
6.1%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.85%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawHonduran
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
92.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
92.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
91.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
87.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
85.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
83.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
79.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
57.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
51.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Chickasaw vs Honduran Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Honduran communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Chickasaw vs Honduran Disability
Disability MetricChickasawHonduran
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Average
11.3%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
25.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
48.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%