Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,636,754 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 48.5 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $106,057, a difference of 51.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $124,188, a difference of 51.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $116,626, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,818, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $70,103, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 81.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 81.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.4%).