Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Iraq
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Iraq

Fair
Average
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,314
SOCIAL INDEX
50.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
180th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Iraq Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,864,284 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.652. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.166% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 166.1 Immigrants from Iraq.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Iraq Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,201, a difference of 19.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,384, a difference of 19.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,594, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,864, a difference of 10.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,681, a difference of 10.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$41,365
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Poor
$98,786
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Poor
$82,594
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Poor
$44,988
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Poor
$52,681
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$37,864
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,384
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$89,444
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Fair
$98,201
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Fair
$59,824
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Poor
26.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.6%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Average
12.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Average
17.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Fair
16.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
39.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
82.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 33.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.66%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
58.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Good
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Good
89.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Good
66.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Good
60.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Average
46.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Average
37.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Poor
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.2%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Iraq Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Iraq
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
49.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%