Apache vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Apache
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Apache
Immigrants from China
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Apache Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,860,123 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to a decrease of 57.7 Immigrants from China.
Apache vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $54,264, a difference of 55.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,260 compared to $119,756, a difference of 49.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $122,178, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $57,931, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $69,174, a difference of 26.5%).
Income Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,886 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,451 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,927 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,388 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,429 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,895 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,395 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,260 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,184 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,668 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.5% | Poor 26.7% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 91.2%), single male poverty (21.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 89.6%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.5%).
Poverty Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.3% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.6% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 97.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 90.7%), and male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.8% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.0% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.7% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.2% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 61.5%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.46 compared to 3.23, a difference of 7.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.46 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 99.6%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 93.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.7% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.0% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.8% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.2% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Apache vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 111.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 71.7%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 15.7%).
Disability Metric | Apache | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.0% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 53.6% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |