Chickasaw vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,057,453 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 14.4 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,629, a difference of 24.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,377, a difference of 23.7%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,049, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,563, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,709, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.0%).