Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,313,137 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.582% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 582.0 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,584, a difference of 26.0%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,553, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,188, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,976, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,374, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.4%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.93%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.9%).